|
 |
Noise and Vibration Research Group - Research Topics
Halfcar test setup for experimental nonlinear multivariable
identification and control
|
|
|
Within the framework of FWO project G.0528 "Accurate tracking
control for nonlinear multivariable systems based on experimentally
identified general block-oriented models" we have developped a
multivariable test setup with localized and controllable
nonlinearities. It is designed to validate (nonlinear)
identification and control techniques.
Experimental data is available on request for anyone who is
working in the area of identification and is looking for
experimental data to check their algorithms. Even custom made
experiments based on desired excitation signals can be done on
request.
|
 |
 |
Description of the Test Setup |
 |
 |
|
|
The test setup is a scale model of the rear axis of a car
suspension. This system was chosen because of it's industrial
relevance with respect to control applications [2].
Figure 1 shows a picture of the developed test setup. The mass
mc represents the car body with inertia
Jc. The suspension is modelled using 2
dampers, 2 springs and a mass ms. The 2
wheels are represented by 2 springs and 2 masses
mwl and mwr.
The road displacement is enforced by 2 hydraulicly actuated pistons
(not shown in figure 1).
The system has 4 inputs:
- two active: left and right piston displacements (0 - 0.1m)
and
- two semi-active: viscosity of magneto-rheological dampers (0 -
1.5V).
The maximum velocity of the pistons (figure 2) is determined by
the flow rate of the pump and is about 1m/s. The position of the
pistons, measured with an integrated magneto-strictive sensor, is
controlled using a PID controller and a servo valve. The bandwidth
is about 30Hz with a slight overshoot at 25Hz.
The semi-active dampers [3] are a product of LORD Corporation, type
RD-1097-01. The damper is filled with a
magneto-rheological fluid. The damping characteristic can be
altered by changing the magnetic field around the fluid. This
magnetic field is determined by sending a current to the damper.
The current in its turn is controlled by a voltage between 0V and
1.5V.
To control the test setup a dSpace DS1104 system is used. Combined with
Matlab/Simulink and ControlDesk, this system allows us to apply
arbitrary signals to all 4 inputs simultaneously.
The system has 10 sensors (indicated in figure 1):
- accelerations at the left and right side of mass
mc,
- forces passing through the suspension left and right,
- compression of the left and right damper,
- displacement of the masses ms and
mc and
- position of the left and right piston.
The displacements of the 2 masses as well as the compression of
the left and right damper are measured using Baumer Electric
laser displacement sensors. Type OADM 12I6460/S35Ais used for the compression of
the dampers and type OADM 20I6472/S14F for the displacement of the 2
masses.
All the measurements as well as the control loop for the
displacement of the left and right piston are done at 2kHz. Due to
a limitation of the measurement system only 8 sensors can be
measured simultaneously.
Figure 3 shows a schematic representation of the test setup. The
figure introduces a terminology to refer to the different parts and
motions of the test setup in a uniform and consistent way:
- the subscript l refers to the left side, r to the
right side
- the subscript w refers to the wheel, s to the
suspension, d to the damper, b to the suspension
linkage bar, g to the center of gravity and c to the
car body
- mwl, mwr,
ms, mc and
Jc refer to the corresponding
inertia's
- xwl, xwr,
xs, xc,
xcl, xcr,
xg, qs and qc refer to the
corresponding displacements and rotations
- Fwl, Fwr,
Fbl, Fbr,
Fsl, Fsr,
Fdl and Fdr
refer to the forces passing through the corresponding elements
- Ffs and Ffc
refers to the friction force in the corresponding linear
guide.
The spring stiffness as mentioned on the data sheet are for the
left and right wheel spring 11700N/m and for the left and right
suspension spring 3790N/m. The data sheet for the dampers can be
found here. Some modelling of a magneto-rheological damper
has been done in [4] and damper characteristics are shown in [3].
The masses are not known.
|
|

Figure 1: Halfcar test setup.

Figure 2: Hydraulic piston unit.

Figure 3: Schematic representation of the test setup.
|
 |
 |
Related
Publications |
 |
 |
- J. Schoukens, J.G. Nemeth, P. Crama, Y. Rolain, R. Pintelon;
Fast Approximate Identification of Nonlinear Systems; Automatica,
nr. 39, pp. 1267-1274, 2003.
- J. De Cuyper, D. Coppens, C. Liefooghe, J. Swevers, M.
Verhaegen; Advanced Drive File Development Methods for Improved
Service Load Simulation on Multi Axial Durability Test Rigs, Proc.
of the International Acoustics and Vibration Asia Conference,
Singapore, pp. 339-354, 1998.
- M.J. Chrzan, J.D. Carlson; MR Fluid Sponge Devices and their
use in Vibration Control of Washing Machines; Proc. SPIE Vol. 4331,
p. 370- 378, Smart Structures and Materials 2001: Damping and
Isolation.
- S.M. Savaresi, S. Bittanti, M. Montiglio; Identification of
Semiphysical and Black-box Nonlinear Models: the case of MR-dampers
for Vehicles Control; Automatica, nr. 41, pp. 113-127, 2004.
|
|
 |
 |
Contact |
 |
 |
|
For more information and experimental data, please contact ir.
Kris Smolders. |
|
|
 |